Search The Blog
About this site

Subscribe!

This site aims to connect all the dots of my online activities - from tools, books blogs and twitter accounts, to upcoming conferences, engagements and user group talks.

from 5whys.com
Twitter: @RoyOsherove
My Books

New:

 

The Art of Unit Testing

Buy PDF or Print book at Manning

Buy on Amazon

Latest Posts
« Notes from my .NET Rocks show on Regex | Main | U2U refuses to work with Israelis due to ' War crimes and apartheid' in Israel »
Wednesday
Sep272006

Using TypeMock vs. Design for testability

Eli Lopian, the Israeli guy who is now running TypeMock - one of the most powerful Mocking frameworks out there for.NET developers, opened a blog. I personally know the guy and he is a brilliant coder and architect - so it's worth listening to what he has to say.

For example. in this post he lists resources for and against using TypeMock  because of the design issues you can run into - you don't have to design for testability if you use it - you just intercept all calls to objects(even static ones) when you test. it's really quite scary and too easy - does not make you think at all.

I'm from the "Design for testability" side. Eli is not - and he always has interesting arguments. He even wrote a rather controversial article on codeproject talking about this issue. Read it to get both sides.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Web Analytics